Skip to main content

Table 3 Pooled data of self-reported functional health and well-being at 24 and 34 year of age in subjects born extremely preterm and age- and gender matched term-born controls using the SF-36 questionnairea

From: Development of health-related quality of life and subjective health complaints in adults born extremely preterm: a longitudinal cohort study

 

Unadjustedb

Mean difference

Adjustedc

Mean difference

Response variable

SF-36

EP-born verus Term-born estimate

with 95% CI

EP-born versus Term-born estimate

with 95% CI

Physical Functioning

 − 8.93 ( − 14.56,  − 3.30)**

 − 1.60 ( − 7.18, 3.98)

Role Physical

 − 5.54 ( − 15.11, 4.02)

 − 0.98 ( − 11.00, 9.04)

Bodily Pain

 − 8.80 ( − 16.48,  − 1.13)**

 − 2.81 ( − 11.13, 5.50)

General Health

 − 7.23 ( − 13.08,  − 1.39)**

 − 5.94 ( − 13.19, 1.31)

Vitality

 − 11.15 ( − 16.84,  − 5.47)***

 − 7.34 ( − 14.08,  − 0,61)*

Social Functioning

 − 11.97 ( − 19.55,  − 4.40)**

 − 10.11 ( − 18.10,  − 2.12)*

Role Emotional

 − 22.11 ( − 33.19, 11.04)***

 − 15.48 ( − 27.40,  − 3.55)**

Mental Health

 − 8.83 ( − 13.86,  − 3.79)***

 − 6.12 ( − 11.87,  − 0.36)*

  1. CI confidence interval EP extremely preterm SD standard deviation
  2. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001
  3. aSF-36: Short Form Health Survey-36, with possible domain scores from 0 to 100, higher score indicates better functional health and well-being
  4. bMixed effects linear models including EP-born and term-born and age group. No significant difference between age 24 and 34 was found and therefore the results without age in the model are reported to increase the statistical power
  5. cMixed effects linear models adjusted for gender, education level, employment status and age were used in the model to assess differences in the SF-36 scores between 24 and 34 years, and between the groups at each age, including a group by age interaction
  6. dCollege/University under or over 4 years
  7. eNot working/retirement income or working