Comparing the EQ-5D-5L and stroke impact scale 2.0 in stroke patients: an analysis of measurement properties

Table 4 Known-groups validity of the 5L and the SIS for different groups

Dimension	Sex^a p-value	Age groups^b H (df)	Diagnosis^b H (df)	mRS^b H (df)	BI^{b, c} H (df)
5L index (n = 783)	< 0.001	51.67 (9)**	17.62 (2)**	90.17 (4)**	84.8 (2)**
SIS physical (n = 190)	< 0.001	43.391 (9)**	16.73 (2)**	39.06 (4)**	28.04 (2)**
5L VAS (n = 804)	< 0.001	41.73 (9)**	18.65 (2)**	81.43 (4)**	63.45 (2)**
SIS VAS (n = 768)	< 0.001	23.15 (9)*	42.44 (2)**	103.91 (4)**	49.99 (2)**
5L AD (n = 783)	< 0.001	16.05 (9)	0.59 (2)	21.68 (4)**	20.22 (2)**
SIS emotion (n = 190)	< 0.05	12.75 (9)	1.92 (2)	7.15 (4	7.29 (2)*
5L UA (n = 783)	< 0.001	54.45(9)**	35.41 (2)**	142.28 (4)**	111.88 (2)**
SIS ADL/IADL (n = 190)	< 0.001	45.08 (9)**	14.43 (2)**	38.83 (4)**	32.03 (2)**
5L MO (n = 783)	< 0.001	70.97 (9)**	13.71 (2)*	80.77 (4)**	96.76 (2)**
SIS mobility (n = 190)	< 0.001	46.45 (9)**	8.42 (2)*	30.64 (4)**	26.31 (2)**

df degrees of freedom, BI Barthel Index 5L EQ-5D-5L, SIS Stroke Impact Scale,
VAS Visual Analogue Scale, AD Anxiety/Depression, UA Usual Activities, MO Mobility,
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001
^a Wilcoxon rank-sum W
^b Kruskal-Wallis H
^c for the Barthel Index: 5L index, 5L AD, 5L UA, 5L MO n = 737; 5L VAS n = 758; SIS physical, SIS emotion, SIS ADL/IADL, SIS mobility n = 182; SIS VAS n = 723

ISSN: 1477-7525