BUI [131] | HAQ-PBM, QLQ-PBM, MSIS-PB [61] | CP-6D [66] | CARIES-QC-U [112] | DHP-3D & 5D [80] | ||||||||||||||
Step 9. Select Rasch or IRT model and fit model | ||||||||||||||||||
Rasch rating scale | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Rasch partial credit | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
Unspecified polytymous Rasch | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Graded response IRT | ||||||||||||||||||
Response level orderinga | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
Meaningfulness of merged levels | ||||||||||||||||||
Item parameters at logit 0 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Global model fit – item-trait interactionb | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Person separation index or person separation reliabilityc | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Infit, Outfit | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
Item fit residualsd | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Local dependence | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Differential item functioning | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Person fit residualse | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Targeting of scale to persons | ||||||||||||||||||
Unidimensionality – principal components analysis of residuals, independent t-statistics | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Step 10. Select items per dimension | ||||||||||||||||||
Item coverage across range of construct | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Floor and ceiling effects | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Missing data (%) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
Correlation of item to dimension | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Item importance and impactf | HCP | P | P, HCP | P | X | |||||||||||||
Step 11. Model validation | ||||||||||||||||||
Expert validation | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Another data-set or split half | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Meaningful clinical rationale (face and content validityf | HCP | HCP, P | HCP, R | HCP, R | R | P, G | HCP, P | HCP | ||||||||||
Alignment with parent psychometric instrumentC, E, P | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
MF-8D [107] | POS-E [116] | MHOM RA [117] | MacNew-7D [87] | ECOHIS-4D [114] | PBI-WRQL [111] | PB-HIV [131] | CFQ-R-8 D [69] | |||||||||||
Step 9. Select Rasch or IRT model and fit model | ||||||||||||||||||
Rasch rating scale | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Rasch partial credit | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
Unspecified polytymous Rasch | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||
Graded response IRT | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Response level orderinga | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
Meaningfulness of merged levels | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Item parameters at logit 0 | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Global model fit – item-trait interactionb | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||
Person separation index or person separation reliabilityc | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
Infit, outfit | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Item fit residualsd | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
Local dependence | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Differential item functioning | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Person fit residualse | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Targeting of scale to persons | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Unidimensionality – principal components analysis of residuals, independent t-statistics | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
Step 10. Select items per dimension | ||||||||||||||||||
Item coverage across range of construct | X | X# | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Absence of floor and ceiling effects | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Percentage missing data | X | X | ||||||||||||||||
Correlation of item to dimension | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||
Item importance and impacte | PCA | |||||||||||||||||
Step 11. Model validation | ||||||||||||||||||
Expert validation | X | |||||||||||||||||
Another data-set or split half | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||
Meaningful clinical rationale (face and content validitye | P, HCP | HCP | P | P, HCP | X | |||||||||||||
Alignment with parent psychometric instrumentC, E, P | X |