Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Delphi panelists and participants in the workgroup meeting

From: Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Self-reported characteristic

Delphi study (total n = 109); n (%)

Workgroup meeting (total n = 24); n (%)

Primary perspective

  Academia

94(86)

18(75)

  Hospital

4(4)

1(4)

  Industry

2(2)

1(4)

  Government

1(1)

0(0)

  Editor

1(1)

0(0)

  Non-profit

1(1)

0(0)

  Patient

4(4)

3(13)

  Patient representative

1(1)

1(4)

  Public member

1(1)

0(0)

Job titlea

  PhD student

6(6)

2(10)

  Research assistant

2(2)

1(5)

  Postdoctoral research fellow

15(15)

2(10)

  (Senior) researcher/research associate

16(16)

7(35)

  (Senior) lecturer

7(7)

0(0)

  (Assistant/associate) professor

35(34)

4(20)

  Clinician/therapist (various)

12(12)

1(5)

  Editor/reader/information specialist

5(5)

1(5)

  Director/dean/chair

5(5)

2(10)

Country of workplaceb

  UK

28(26)

3(13)

  Canada

27(25)

16(67)

  USA

15(14)

2(8)

  Australia

12(11)

0(0)

  Spain

9(8)

0(0)

  Netherlands

5(5)

2(8)

  Italy

3(3)

1(4)

 Japan

2(2)

0(0)

 Otherc

8(7)

0(0)

Relevant groupa, d

 OMI systematic review author

78(76)

12(60)

 Systematic review author

66(64)

13(65)

 OMI developer

62(60)

11(55)

 Clinician

42(41)

4(20)

 Core outcome set developer

32(31)

11(55)

 Epidemiologist

21(20)

11(55)

 Psychometrician/clinimetrician

18(17)

9(45)

 Journal editor

17(17)

4(20)

 Reporting guideline developer

12(12)

9(45)

 Biostatistician

5(5)

0(0)

Highest level of educationa

 Master’s degree

11(11)

3(15)

 MD

10(10)

1(5)

 PhD

56(54)

12(60)

 MD/PhD

26(25)

4(20)

Expertise on systematic reviews of OMIsa

 High

57(55)

11(55)

 Average

41(40)

8(40)

 Low

5(5)

1(5)

Expertise on PRISMAa

 High

60(58)

12(60)

 Average

36(35)

4(20)

 Low

7(7)

4(20)

Expertise on COSMINa

 High

37(36)

9(45)

 Average

53(51)

8(40)

 Low

13(13)

3(15)

Previously involved in researche

 As participant

5(58)

4(100)

 As patient/public research partner

6(100)

4(100)

Previously involved in methodological researche

 As participant

2(33)

2(50)

 As patient/public research partner

4(67)

3(75)

 Previously involved in a Delphi studye

4(67)

3(75)

  1. COSMIN COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments; OMI outcome measurement instrument; PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
  2. aNot asked to patients, patient representatives and public members; b Patients, patient representatives and public members were asked for their country of residence; c Other countries (all n = 1): Belgium, China, South Korea, Singapore, France, South Africa, New Zealand, Switzerland; d Panelists could select multiple responses; e Only asked to patients, patient representatives and public members