Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of pilot testers

From: Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024

Self-reported characteristic

Pilot testers

(total n = 65); n (%)

Job title

  (Post)graduate student

3(5)

  PhD student

19(29)

  Research assistant

6(9)

  Postdoctoral research fellow

4(6)

  (Senior) researcher/research associate

7(11)

  (Senior) lecturer

8(12)

  (Assistant) professor

11(17)

  Clinician/therapist (various)

7(11)

Country of workplace

 Brazil

8(12)

 UK

7(11)

 Canada

6(9)

 Germany

4(6)

 Belgium

4(6)

 Mexico

4(6)

 Australia

3(5)

 The Netherlands

3(5)

 Italy

3(5)

 Spain

3(5)

 China

2(3)

 Iran

2(3)

 Switzerland

2(3)

 Turkey

2(3)

 United states

2(3)

 Othera

10(15)

Highest level of education

  Bachelor’s degree

3(5)

  Master’s degree

21(32)

  MD

21(32)

  PhD

5(8)

  MD/PhD

9(14)

  Other

6(9)

Participated in the Delphi study

  Yes

6(9)

  No

59(91)

Use of guidelineb

  As a checklist after drafting the review

55(93)

  As a writing tool during drafting the rewiew

38(65)

  As a peer-review tool for someone else’s review

14(24)

  As a teaching tool

19(32)

Review used for pilot testingc

  Published

13(22)

  Not yet published

46(78)

Role in review used for pilot testingc

  First author

45(76)

  Co-author

8(14)

  PI/senior author

6(10)

  1. aOther countries (all n = 1): Greece, Ireland, Malaysia, Malta, Norway, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, France, Sri Lanka; bOnly asked to participants who completed pilot testing (n = 59); participants could select multiple responses; cOnly asked to participants who completed pilot testing (n = 59)