Skip to main content

Table 2 Sample characteristics of the final eligible sample and non-responders

From: Perceptions of adults with type 1 diabetes toward diabetes-specific quality of life measures: a survey-based qualitative exploration

Variable

Respondents

(N = 384)

Non-respondents

(N = 1194)

Demographic

n

 

n

 

Currently live: UK

384

216 (56)**

1194

923 (77)

Sex: female

384

271 (71)

1194

865 (72)

Age, years

384

46.0 ± 15.2**

46.0 (33.0, 59.0)

1194

40.2 ± 14.8

40.0 (27.0, 52.0)

Birth country: outside of UK/Aus

384

34 (9)

1194

55 (5)

Main Language: English

384

380 (99)

1194

1184 (99)

Education: University degree

383

197 (51)**

1194

328 (27)

Clinical characteristics

n

 

n

 

Diabetes duration, years

384

25.5 ± 15.3**

24.0 (13.3, 36.8)

1194

20.2 ± 14.1

17.5 (9.0, 30.0)

Insulin administration: pump

384

132 (34)*

1194

346 (29)

Glucose monitoring: Flash or CGM device

378

89 (24)**

1175

181 (15)

HbA1c (in past 12 months), %

324

7.7 ± 1.4*

7.4 (6.9,8.2)

781

8.0 ± 1.8

7.7 (7.0, 8.9)

Complications of diabetes: ≥1

384

190 (49)*

1193

528 (44)

Diabetes-specific QoL measures

n

 

n

 

Number attempted (max: 5)

384

5 (5,5)**

1194

5 (3,5)

Number with feedback (max: 5)

384

1 (1,2)

-

-

Total scores

    

ADDQOL-19

(range: -9-+3)a

367

-2.9 ± 2.3*

-2.4 (-4.3,-1.0)

988

-3.2 ± 2.1

-3.0 (-4.7, -1.5)

DCP

(range: 1–5)b

364

2.7 ± 0.9**

2.8 (2.1, 3.4)

984

2.9 ± 0.8

3.0 (2.3, 3.5)

DIDP

(range: 1–7)b

362

5.0 ± 0.9

5 (4.4, 5.7)

969

5.1 ± 0.9

5 (4.6,5.6)

DSQoLS

(range: 0-100)a

338

56.9 ± 23.3**

57.4 (39.9, 74.8)

895

51.0 ± 23.3

50.9 (32.6, 68.8)

Diabetes QOL-Q

(range: 1–5)a

358

3.3 ± 0.9*

3.4 (2.7, 4.1)

943

3.2 ± 0.9

3.2 (2.6, 3.8)

  1. Data are n(%), Mean ± SD or Median(lower quartile, upper quartile)
  2. **p < 0.001, * p < 0.05, where comparisons are made between the sample who did/did not provide ≥ 1 valid qualitative response across diabetes-specific QoL questionnaires. Comparisons suggest, compared to non-respondents, respondents were: less likely to live in the UK, older, with longer diabetes durations and slightly higher HbA1c, more likely to report university level education, diabetes-related complications, insulin pump use and flash of continuous glucose monitor use, and reported less negative impact of diabetes on QoL across four of the five questionnaires
  3. aHigher scores indicate less negative/more positive impact of diabetes on QoL
  4. bHigher scores indicate more negative/less positive impact of diabetes on QoL