Skip to main content

Table 4 Confirmatory factor analysis results

From: Validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the Indonesian version of FACIT-COST measure for subjective financial toxicity

Factor loadings

Factor

FACIT-COST itema

Estimate

p-value

Factor 1

FT2

Out-of-pocket expenses are more than thought

0.474

p < 0.001

FT3

Worry about future financial problems

0.819

p < 0.001

FT4

No choice about money spent

0.791

p < 0.001

FT5

Frustrated about inability to contribute/work as usual

0.739

p < 0.001

FT8

Feel financially stressed

0.808

p < 0.001

FT9

Concerned about keeping income

0.810

p < 0.001

FT10

Reduced financial satisfaction due to treatment/disease

0.846

p < 0.001

Factor 2

FT1

Have enough money to cover treatment

0.509

p < 0.001

FT6

Satisfied with current finances

0.847

p < 0.001

FT7

Able to meet monthly expenses

0.899

p < 0.001

FT11

In control of finances

0.641

p < 0.001

Factor 1 ↔ Factor 2 covariance = -0.577

Correlations in the model

FT5 ↔ FT9

0.178

FT2 ↔ FT4

0.178

FT3 ↔ FT4

0.146

Goodness-of-fit statistics (95% confidence interval)

RMSEA

SRMR

CFI

TLI

0.042 (0.019–0.063)

0.049 (0.048–0.074)

0.998 (0.990–0.999)

0.997 (0.987–0.997)

  1. CFI Comparative Fit Index, FACIT-COST COST: A FACIT Measure of Financial Toxicity, RMSEA Root mean square error of approximation, SRMR Standardized root mean square residual, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index
  2. aLabeled by the authors based on the FACIT-COST items