Skip to main content

Table 3 Model fit indices resulting from CFA using maximum-likelihood estimation with robust standard errors

From: Validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale for the Mental Health Surveillance (MHS) of German adults

Model

χ2(df)

RMSEA (90%CI)*

CFI

SRMR

AIC

WEMWBS

     

One-factor model

1063.220(77)*

0.109 (0.102–0.116)

0.909

0.053

29577.536

Three-factor model

637.344(74)*

0.083 (0.076–0.090)

0.949

0.046

29157.660

Bifactor model

339.882(61)*

0.064 (0.056–0.072)

0.975

0.025

28886.198

SWEMWBS

     

One-factor model

348.084(14)*

0.149 (0.133–0.166)

0.909

0.059

16025.163

Three-factor model

122.645(11)*

0.097 (0.079–0.116)

0.970

0.036

15805.724

Bifactor model

13.845(5)*

0.039 (0.008–0.068)

0.998

0.008

15708.925

  1. Note. N = 1048. CFA = Confirmatory Factor Analyses, WEMWBS = Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, SWEMWBS = Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale – Short Form. χ2  = chi-square, RMSEA = robust root mean square error of approximation, 90% CI = 90% confidence interval, CFI = robust comparative fit index, SRMR = standardized root mean square residual, AIC = Akaike information criterion. * p < .001