Skip to main content

Table 2 Study characteristics at the meso-/macro-level (sorted by medical domain)

From: The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes – a systematic review

Author (year)

Domain

Patients

Number of patients

PROM(s) used (GEN = generic, DS = disease-specific)

Overall impact

Quality of study

Benchmarking

Boyce (2015)

Orthopedics

Receiving primary hip arthroplasty

I:230; C:228

OHS (DS)

 ~ 

Weak

Varagunam (2014)

Orthopedics and general surgery

Receiving hip or knee arthroplasty, varicose vein or inguinal hernia surgery

I: 7 k-30 k; C:NA

EQ-5D-5L (GEN), EQ VAS (GEN), 1 of 3 disease-specific questionnaires (OHS, OKS, AVVQ)

 ~ 

Moderate

Weingarten (2000)

Primary care

Elderly

I:541; C:543

Dartmouth COOP (GEN)

 ~ 

Moderate

Kumar (2021)

Urology

Undergoing prostate surgery for cancer

I:212; C:210

Selected items (continence, sexual function) from the EPIC (DS)

-

Weak

In-depth analysis of data

Haller (2011)

Internal and surgical departments

Wards

I:1237; C:1113

IPO questionnaire (DS), NRS pain

 + 

Moderate

Zaslansky (2019)

Surgical departments

Wards

I:? C:?

IPO questionnaire (DS), NRS pain

 + 

Weak

Garduño-López (2021)

Surgical departments

Wards

I:? C:?

IPO questionnaire (DS), NRS pain

 + 

Weak

PDCA-cycle

Partridge (2016)

Orthopedics

Patient receiving total knee arthroplasty

I:827, C:441

OKS (DS), EQ-5D-3L (GEN)

 + 

Moderate

  1. Studies are categorized according to the mechanism applied. Additional study characteristics, full quality assessment and all extracted outcomes can be found in Supplementary Material 3, Table 1 to 3
  2. AVVQ Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, COOP Primary Care Cooperative Information Project, EPIC Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, EQ-5D-3L Three-level version of the EQ-5D, EQ-5D-5L Five-level version of the EQ-5D, IPO International Pain Outcomes Questionnaire, NRS Numerical Rating Scale, OHS Oxford Hip Score, OKS Oxford Knee Score, VAS Visual Analogue Scale